Ingress Protection (IP) ratings are frequently cited in outdoor solar lighting specifications, yet they are also widely misunderstood. While IP ratings describe resistance to dust and water ingress, they do not fully define real-world durability or long-term reliability.
Understanding what IP ratings do—and do not—represent is critical for evaluating outdoor solar lighting systems.
An IP rating consists of two digits:
First digit (solid protection): resistance to dust and solid particles
Second digit (liquid protection): resistance to water ingress
For example:
IP65: dust-tight, protected against water jets
IP66: dust-tight, protected against powerful water jets
IP67: dust-tight, protected against temporary immersion
These tests are performed under controlled laboratory conditions for limited durations.
IP testing does not account for:
Long-term thermal cycling
UV exposure and material aging
Pressure changes inside sealed housings
Repeated condensation and evaporation cycles
As a result, a product can meet IP67 requirements and still fail prematurely in real outdoor environments.
In practice, durability depends less on the IP number and more on how sealing is implemented. Gasket materials, joint geometry, venting strategies, and assembly consistency all influence long-term protection.
Poorly designed seals may pass initial testing but degrade quickly due to temperature changes and material fatigue.
Fully sealed enclosures trap internal moisture. Without pressure equalization or breathable venting solutions, condensation can form inside the housing, leading to corrosion and electronic failure—even in products with high IP ratings.
IP ratings describe short-term resistance under test conditions.
Long-term outdoor reliability depends on sealing design, materials, and environmental adaptation—not on the IP number alone.